You Know What I Love?

I love when a DUMBFUCK tries to insult someone’s intelligence, only to lace up the golf cleats once more and stomp his crank by fucking up the movie reference, making himself look like the idiot he is.

Stupid motherfucker.


Bill Schmalfeldt, Plagiarist

For a long time now, it has been an established truth that Bill Schmalfeldt engages in plagiarism.

Is that defamatory? Not if truth is a defense, as we shall see in a moment.

If I were so inclined, I could track down half a dozen examples, and perhaps more, of Bill Schmalfeldt’s rank perfidy.  But I’m not so inclined.  Instead, I will mention one known example and leave it to the archivists to reproduce if they wish. In addition I am going to provide two more concrete examples to prove that – for the Google bomb –


…not to mention really fucking stupid. Continue reading “Bill Schmalfeldt, Plagiarist”


Busy, Busy Birdies

The story you are about to read is true.  It is multiply-sourced and independently verified.

A while back, my good zombie pal Morgana posted this:

A reminder that since 2009, Bill Schmalfeldt has been unable to drive because, he says, Parkinson’s had so eroded his muscle control and executive function that he could not tell the accelerator from the brake pedal.  He decided that it would be a bad idea for society at large to allow Bill Schmalfeldt behind the wheel of an automobile.

Because Parkinson’s.

Continue reading “Busy, Busy Birdies”


Just To Show What a Pluperfect Asshole @Leonidas_BU Is

I present these tweets:



That’s right: this STOLEN VALOR, DUMBFUCK VEXATIOUS LITIGANT (now threatening to file LOLSUIT VIII against Stacy McCain for – trust me on this – Butthurt in the First Degree) demonstrates that confimation bias is confirming…in two tweets… just five days apart.


Looks Like Someone Touched A Nerve


As long as people keep their filth inside their own blogs and not in my comment section, or on my Twitter timeline, or on my Facebook account, folks will have nothing to worry about.

Now as far as I can tell, BusPassOffice has made a pastime of sharing comments from an old forum which illustrate NOT ONLY what a fucking idiot our pal DUMBFUCK has been but also FOR HOW VERY, VERY LONG the burnt Fool’s bandaged finger has gone wabbling back to the Fire.

DUMBFUCK seems upset.  I don’t understand why; none of this is reaching ITS comment section, ITS Twitter timeline, or ITS Facebook account.

DUMBFUCK seems upset that this is going on in other people’s blogs. It has to GO LOOKING FOR ITS BUTTHURT.

Like an addict on the pipe.

But there’s this little bit of advice I like to remember in situations just like this.  I’ve forgotten where I first heard it.

It goes like this:

If you are offended by anything you read here, I might suggest that you not visit here again. If you do, and are offended again, that will be your fault… not mine.

DUMBFUCK seems upset.  Its fault.

DUMBFUCK seems bothered. Its fault.

DUMBFUCK seems a little torqued.  Its fault.

DUMBFUCK seems a lot BUTTHURT.  Its fault.

Don’t wanna be upset? Don’t wanna be bothered? Don’t wanna be torqued?

Don’t wanna be BUTTHURT?

Stay away, you weak little pussy.  If you can’t?

Your fault.



So What I Hear Him Saying Is…

He’s NOT okay with his pro se pal Brett Kimberlin being an admitted forger and fabricator of evidence?

Because, you know…DOUBLE STANDARDS, right?

Someone seems a little manic tonight…perhaps the choice between giving himself his shots and taking his pills fell the wrong way?



What just happened?


Scawwy. I so scawwed.

I will blog what I want to blog.

I will tweet what I want to tweet.

And I know that Buzz Punko-Makes-Ladies-Blow-Chunko will see it all. Because he’s certainly not looking for me.

Hey! Quit bothering me in there!  I see you not leaving me alone!
Hey! Quit bothering me in there! I see you not leaving me alone!

Oh, wait – I have a new follower on Twitter!

Even a ridiculous, sand-pantied, skirt-hiking runaway pussy DUMBFUCK knows that RIDICULE IS NOT A FUCKING TORT, any more than BUTTHURT is.  And automated emails from third parties (like WordPress pingbacks or Twitter notifications) are NOT contact, whether a weeping, sand-filled, nutshuffling cockfaced pussy comes looking for it or not.

So, Zombies, always remember – you come looking?  You get what you get.

What the hell is he gonna do? File a RICO lawsuit or something?

I’d like to see it.


Which Loop Are You In?

I’ll bet we can all name someone in the bottom loop.  And by “someone” I mean everyone would name the same guy.

Except that guy. Right, DUMBFUCK?


Only a DUMBFUCK Could Miss the Point of This Post

Let us consider the curious case of Bill Munko, also known as Bill Schmalfeldt.

Bill Schmalfeldt is known to be an adjudicated cyberstalker and cyberharasser.  He has over the last several years, been served with NINE restraining orders from FIVE different states.  He is currently under court orders to avoid contact with persons in Arizona, Illinois, Massachusetts and North Carolina.

He claims that he has recently reported one of these persons to law enforcement for writing a letter that he has forgotten sending, likely due to Parkinson’s Dementia, a condition he has publicly admitted to having more than once, including in a letter to a federal judge presiding over a lawsuit which was none of his fucking business but he still stuck his shitcaked nose into because reasons.

He has made clear, several times and in no uncertain terms, that he believes I am that person, most recently yesterday.

View post on

View post on

View post on

View post on

Now, if any of you voracious Zombies had been ordered by a court in Illinois to avoid contact with a person, would you not avoid contact with that person?  Would you not follow the text of the order, to wit:

The Respondent is prohibited from threatening to commit staking or committing stalking.  “Stalking” means engaging in a “course of conduct” directed at a specific person, when you know or should know that this course of conduct would cause a reasonable person to fear for his or her safety or the safety of a third person or suffer emotional distress.  A stalking “course of conduct” includes acts in which you directly, indirectly or through third parties, by any action, method, device, or means follow monitor, observe, surveil, threaten or communicate to or about, a person; or engage in other contact; or interfere with or damage a person’s property or pet. Stalking can include contact via electronic communications.  See 740 ILCS 21/10 for additional definitions.

Consider a few of the specific terms above.

Prohibited from…committing stalking.  This seems pretty clear

Stalking means engaging in a “course of conduct” directed at a specific person when you know…that this course of conduct would cause a reasonable person to fear for his safety…or suffer emotional distress. 

Do you think being repeatedly and unsuccessfully sued for butthurt (which still is not a tort) would cause a reasonable person to suffer emotional distress?  Might it even cause a person to have years – YEARS!! – shaved off his lifespan as a result?  That certainly seems like it would be emotionally distressing.  It also seems like something Bill Schmalfeldt would or should know about, because he has used those EXACT words to describe the emotional distress he claims to have been caused by others in the past. (Just because he forgets a lot of the shit he says, doesn’t mean the rest of us do.)

A stalking “course of conduct” includes acts in which you DIRECTLY…by any ACTION, METHOD, DEVICE or MEANS, follow, MONITOR, OBSERVE, surveil, THREATEN or COMMUNICATE to or ABOUT A PERSON; or engage in OTHER CONTACT…Stalking can include CONTACT VIA ELECTRONIC MEANS. (caps are mine)

So if the respondent – Bill Schmalfeldt – DIRECTLY by any ACTION, METHOD, DEVICE or MEANS (such as a VPN like CyberGhost Premium),

View post on

View post on

MONITORS or OBSERVES a PERSON, COMMUNICATES to or ABOUT A PERSON, or engages in other CONTACT (such as attempting to leave comments – ONE HUNDRED THIRTEEN OF THEM AT LAST COUNT – on a website he believes with 100% certainty belongs to that person)

…VIA ELECTRONIC MEANS, isn’t that Respondent – Bill Schmalfeldt – guilty of violating that Stalking No Contact Order?

And even more, after having been so blocked by me, if Bill Schmalfeldt PROACTIVELY AND WITHOUT PROVOCATION purchases a subscription service solely to overcome that block to view the website he believes with 100% certainty belongs to the person he is PROHIBITED FROM STALKING, isn’t adjudicated cyberstalker and cyberharasser Bill Schmalfeldt going to extreme (as well as extremely obvious) criminal lengths to violate that court order?

I wonder what a federal investigator would do with that information?

View post on




I’m not allowed to contact Mrs. @MusicUnshackled either…because she’s DEAD.

You’d rather be butthurt-hunting tonight than eating fish sticks and custard with some slimy twat anyway, AMIRITE?