Fair Warning For All Democrats This Evening

When Donald Trump starts trolling you on Twitter during Shrillary Clinton’s spellcasting over the cauldron acceptance speech tonight (because he will)…

…try to remember that you’re being trolled.

If you go all Splodey McSplodeyface in response, he wins.

My money’s on Splodey McSplodeyface.  Because feeeeeeeeeeeeels.

Like(5)Dislike(0)

IOKIYAD

I have been noting with no small amount of wicked glee over the last two days the spin coming out of the Democratic National Convention in the wake of the #DNCLeak.

You know…Democrats be all like

“OMGWTFBBQ – First person ever to ask a foreign government to interfere in an election!  TREASON! TREASON!  RESIGN! RESIGN!”

Uh…nope.

I’m old enough to remember when this happened.

“On 9-10 May of this year,” the May 14 memorandum explained, “Sen. Edward Kennedy’s close friend and trusted confidant [John] Tunney was in Moscow.” (Tunney was Kennedy’s law school roommate and a former Democratic senator from California.) “The senator charged Tunney to convey the following message, through confidential contacts, to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Y. Andropov.”

Kennedy’s message was simple. He proposed an unabashed quid pro quo. Kennedy would lend Andropov a hand in dealing with President Reagan. In return, the Soviet leader would lend the Democratic Party a hand in challenging Reagan in the 1984 presidential election.

Foreign powers?  Messing about in American presidential elections?  At the behest of “The Liberal Lion?” The man our current President eulogized as ” the greatest legislator of our time?”

Kennedy made Andropov a couple of specific offers.

First he offered to visit Moscow. “The main purpose of the meeting, according to the senator, would be to arm Soviet officials with explanations regarding problems of nuclear disarmament so they may be better prepared and more convincing during appearances in the USA.” Kennedy would help the Soviets deal with Reagan by telling them how to brush up their propaganda.

Ted Kennedy, a Democrat, would tell the Soviet Union how to “brush up their propaganda?”

Kennedy would make certain the networks gave Andropov air time–and that they rigged the arrangement to look like honest journalism.

Well, isn’t it a good thing we don’t have that problem today?

/sarcasm

And why would Ted Kennedy, the Greatest Democrat of his Generation, who was entirely perfect and blameless of anything that ever happened in his life while not behind the wheel of an Oldsmobile, offer such aid and comfort to the Soviet Union during the Cold War?

Surely not something so trivial and callow as presidential politics?

“Tunney remarked that the senator wants to run for president in 1988,” the memorandum continued. “Kennedy does not discount that during the 1984 campaign, the Democratic Party may officially turn to him to lead the fight against the Republicans and elect their candidate president.”

Whoops.

Remember kids:

IT’S OKAY IF YOU’RE A DEMOCRAT.

BUT NOT IF YOU’RE A REPUBLICAN.

OR A DEMOCRAT RUNNING AS A REPUBLICAN.

Like(4)Dislike(0)

In Which A DUMBFUCK “Journalist” Forgets He Is A DUMBFUCK, Not A Journalist

View post on imgur.com

Exit question:  If Hillary Clinton wins the election, won’t that prove Trump’s point?

Like(4)Dislike(0)

Somebody Thought This Was A Good Idea

9-15-2015 3-48-42 PM

Unavailable for comment:

  • Juanita Broddrick
  • Kathleen Willey
  • Paula Jones

 

UPDATE – Dana Loesch – Troll Level – GRANDMASTER

9-15-2015 4-55-44 PM

Like(0)Dislike(0)

What Nobody Is Talking About

BUT WHAT EVERYONE SHOULD WORRY ABOUT

A note from an anonymous journalist (the only kind who ever speaks critically of Hillary) to  Instapundit:

Hillary will be totally blackmail-able if elected. Here’s the logic:

1. It’s safe to say that there were things on that server which could cause Hillary tremendous harm politically – which is why she destroyed the evidence that would have been exculpatory if you believed her explanation. In my mind, it’s also why she used a private server to begin with.

2. She is lying about what was on that server, potentially to include while under oath in her upcoming congressional testimony.

3. If someone had all the copies of her emails and those of her staff, they could readily blackmail her because of the above. They’d have proof of her wrongdoing and her lying about it.

4. Hillary Clinton, as both a future Presidential candidate and a sitting Sec. of State would have been one of the Top 100 intelligence targets in the world and probably one of the top 10.

5. It’s thus certain that the Chinese and Russians would each have had a team focused on accessing her communications.

6. Every security expert I know of has said it’s a virtual certainty the Chinese and Russians both gained access to her server and all her emails. From what I know about their capabilities, I’d agree.

 

Go read the rest.

Like(0)Dislike(0)

Goodbye, Jon Stewart – And Take Your Clown Nose With You

So I understand that Jon Stewart’s EPIC FINAL FAREWELL AS HOST OF THE DAILY SHOW IS TONIGHT.

Good riddance.

On a somewhat related note, today is also the 70th anniversary of the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan.

You might wonder how those two things are related.  If so, thank your lucky stars I am here.  But even more, thank God for Bill Whittle, who once upon a time laid out historical fact against Jon Stewart’s feeeeeeewings, and guess what came out on top.  16 minutes of spitting in Clown Nose’s eye, and every second a treasure.

 

Like(0)Dislike(0)

This Week at SCOTUS

“Well, Doctor, what have we got–a Republic or a Monarchy?”
“A Republic, if you can keep it.”

I’m not all that fussed about it, to tell the truth.  Don’t misunderstand; I think the Supremes have done excellent work this week, if their goal was to stop all this crazy talk of Kelo v. New London being the worst decision of the last 10 years.

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.

The substance of the cases matters little, if at all. What matters to me is the political consequences of the decisions.

We now live in a Republic Without Responsibility.

Our legislative branch is now freed of the responsibility to write laws of any connection to or consistency of intent, and they suffer no consequence for their failure.

Our executive branch is now freed to enforce only those laws with which they are sympathetic, and only as often as they feel is necessary.  They too feel no consequences for their actions.

Our judicial branch has demonstrated in the last two days its unwillingness to interpret laws as written, its willingness to change the actual law to create circumstances not codified by the Legislature, and to interpret our Constitution according to the malleable traditions of social change, without suffering a single adverse note.

Three branches of government, each bound by now-meaningless oaths:

  • Executive

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

  • Legislative

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

  • Judiciary

I, (name), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as (office) under the Constitution and laws of the United States. [So help me God.]

I, (name), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. [So help me God.]

Everybody swears an oath.  Nobody takes it seriously.

That’s my beef here.

People will say these decisions are another step toward the tipping point of the Great American Experiment.  I disagree.

We’re already off that cliff.  These are just the jarring impacts on the way to the bottom.

Like(0)Dislike(0)