And Who Better To Recognize A Toothless Threat Than DUMBFUCK Bill Schmalfeldt?

0 for VIII, anyone?

Let me guess…some of your best friends are Jews, too!  Just like anti-Semite racist woman-hater (thank God you’re just a pecker wrecker sockpuppet!) Bill Schmalfeldt?

Like(9)Dislike(1)

Drawing A Straight Line From Bill Schmalfeldt to Pedophilia, Racism, Misogyny, Anti-Semitism, Drugs & Terrorism

THE FOLLOWING IS A PARODY OF THE POST LINKED HERE: http://www.breitbartunmasked.com/2017/10/09/drawing-a-straight-line-between-robert-mercer-and-nazis/, WRITTEN BY BILL PRESTON-SCHMALFELDT (oh, how PRECIOUS!!) ON OCTOBER 9, 2017.
DO NOT CLICK THAT LINK (IT ISN’T A REAL LINK ANYWAY). IT WILL ONLY ENCOURAGE HIM. BESIDES, THE POST WILL SOON BE DELETED IN A FLOOD OF FEAR PEE, WHICH IS THE HALLMARK OF PRIDE THAT PUNCTUATES THE PATHETIC EXISTENCE OF THE AUTHOR.
INSTEAD, READ THE POST WHERE IT HAS BEEN ARCHIVED AS ETERNAL PROTECTION AGAINST THE INEVITABLE DELETION AND SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE THAT WILL TAKE PLACE SOMETIME SOON.

SAFE LINK: http://archive.is/jYG4S


It’s a simple matter of “unnecessary air-quote” connecting the dots “unnecessary air-unquote:” Drawing a straight line from transient left wing idiot, Stolen Valor veteran, welfare whore and cyberstalking harasser Bill Schmalfeldt to brass knuckles reputation management lawfare aficionado Brett Kimberlin, the convicted Speedway Bomber, domestic terrorist, drug dealer and forger, one-time wannabe rockstar and champion of the movement to, um… “romance” underage girls in the name of pedophilia, a philosophy that is the direct opposite of normal, though not for lack of effort on the part of the enlightened, progressive Left. (It emphasizes that romantic and sexual relationships between adults and children who are legally and emotionally incapable of consent is perfectly fine.

A recent piece in BuzzFeed (which we aren’t going to link because we’re assholes like that here at Cabin Boy Unread) had absolutely nothing to do with the relationship between welfare whore Bill Schmalfeldt and adjudicated pedophile Brett Kimberlin, but you can find plenty of information here.

Schmalfeldt is currently in his second stint as the editor of Breitbart Unmasked (no, I won’t link to it – malware warnings), a website connected to Kimberlin and given to publishing multiple fawning profiles about him while ignoring his criminal history and epic failures at shutting up his critics via lawfare. Schmalfeldt, who tries to portray himself as a glib, sarcastic satirical genius and investigative journalist on this website as well as hundreds of other failed blogs, podcast channels and Twitter accounts he has created, then abandoned or had yanked from public view over the last decade, has also authored many self-published masturbatory fantasies disguised as “exposés” of people he has continuously tried and failed to sue for defamation and other false claims. Many of these books have also been pulled from online bookshelves due to copyright violations.

There’s not much about Schmalfeldt’s public rantings to love.

  • He has written, performed and offered for sale audio skits featuring Cub Scouts discussing and engaging in homosexual acts with one another in pornographic detail;
  • He has written, performed and offered for sale audio skits referring to African American characters as “boy” and referring to them as house servants;
  • He has written, produced and performed audio skits in which he imagines himself disinterring dead babies and eating them;
  • He has published photos of himself eating live kittens;
  • He has referred to Ali Akbar, an African American, as “boy;”
  • After a confederate suggested that the wife of one of the targets of his harassment should be raped, Schmalfeldt helpfully provided the street address on Twitter, while not in any way agreeing with the whole rape thing (wink, wink);
  • He has additionally said, dozens if not hundreds of times, that this same target of his harassment pimped out his wife, while not in any way suggesting that the wife herself was a whore (nudge, nudge);
  • He has insulted the Filipino spouse of a Virginia attorney by suggesting that she was a mail order bride, and that the lawyer might “send her packing back to Asia where he purchased her;” (say no more, say no more)
  • Even though he himself barely graduated high school, and may in fact have been graduated just to get him out of the local educational system, he often refers to women who offer opinions he cannot understand as “dim twats,” “stupid cunts,” “cum-gargling fuckwits” or any of the multiple possible combinations thereof;
  • He has made anti-Semitic statements referring to slaving away like Israelites for Pharoah;
  • He and his insipid balloon animal of a girlfriend regularly insult their perceived adversaries – and believe me, do they ever have to punch up – with homosexual slurs such as gays, fags and faggots;
  • He has published gleeful Twitter rants apophatically referring to one columnist as a “closeted repressed homosexual,” a “simpering, limp-wristed glory-hole queen,” an “angry, self-hating homosexual” and a “pillow-biting studded leather collar-wearing bukkake boy,” as if such sexual orientations were off the normal scales and somehow worthy of scorn;
  • On at least one occasion, he has photoshopped his perceived enemies into homosexual pornographic photographs, as if being homosexual were something to be ashamed of.

The things he says in private are far worse, far more insidious and despicable.

An anonymous but trusted source has provided Thinking Man’s Zombie with communications with Schmalfeldt, in which Schmalfeldt shares his glee over bashing peoples’ skulls with rocks, glorifying over the imagery of kicking people out of their homes, taking away their children’s inheritances, getting them fired from their jobs after doxing them, and shoving lit M-80s up the rectums of their pets just like when he was a kid.

Schmalfeldt is far less glib and urbane when discussing his violent dreams out of sight of the public. He brags about an in situ plot to overthrow the government of the United States, saying that a large number of generals and admirals are on board and ready to move if Donald Trump goes a step too far.  He is either delusional or a liar, but at times like this there is nothing like the power of AND.  Schmalfeldt now has the time to work on funding his latest projects…fleecing the left-wing idiots of America to fund a 48 state “bucket list” road trip along with about $2500 of new toys to “document” the journey, grifting for a brand new mobility scooter that Medicare would pay for if only he could find a competent doctor to prescribe for him, and pro se prosecuting yet another Federal LOLSUIT that has less than a snowball’s chance in Hell of getting to trial.

Is Schmalfeldt just thumping his concave chest? Preening like a peacock, trying to impress the reader with his illusory power and might?

Well, obviously!

And if it isn’t all just talk, where is the funding coming from?

That question takes us back to the beginning.

Brett Kimberlin is a convicted bomber who was found civilly liable for the death of one of his victims but hid all his assets to avoid paying the judgment. He is a convicted forger, drug dealer and perjurer who has spent years along with thousands of dollars engaging in lawfare against many with whom he shares common hatred along with Bill Schmalfeldt. Also, he blew $9000 to buy a fake Russian dossier on Donald Trump.

No, really!

Bill Schmalfeldt is a friend of Brett Kimberlin, by his own admission:

Who’s to say that Kimberlin is not funding Schmalfeldt’s dreams of almost-beachside month-to-month rental retirement in a Myrtle Beach motel-gone-cheap-condo? How do we know Kimberlin is not laughing up his sleeve behind the scenes at Schmalfeldt’s impotent fist shaking dreams of crushing his enemies THIS TIME, AT LONG LAST!!! in a South Carolina court with a case far more flimsy than he has ever had before, even more flimsy than the case that caused a court-conscripted welfare lawyer in Chicago to fire him and run him out of town, shaking with derisive pointage, laughery and mockification?

We don’t know.

Maybe it’s time to start asking questions?

Like(8)Dislike(0)

Hey, While We’re Giving Out Free Advice…

I’m not telling anyone what to do. But it seems to me that if I had

  • lost a lawsuit by voluntarily dismissing it because THE STRESS IS GOING TO KILL ME!!! (after bragging about certain victory);
  • lost a counterclaim lawsuit because I couldn’t find or serve the counterclaim defendants prior to dismissal with prejudice (after bragging about certain victory);
  • lost a third lawsuit because I don’t understand personal jurisdiction (after bragging about certain victory);
  • lost a fourth lawsuit because I couldn’t figure out how to serve the defendants (after bragging about certain victory);
  • lost a fifth lawsuit because I voluntarily dismissed it – WITH PREJUDICE! – because I had to run away from my perjured IFP application and the sanctions sought by the retired lawyer I sued (after bragging about certain victory);
  • lost a sixth lawsuit because I STILL don’t understand personal jurisdiction as well as the “Worst Lawyer in the World”™ (after bragging about certain victory);
  • filed a seventh lawsuit that was so facially without merit that a court appointed lawyer dumped me as a client, had a nervous breakdown, quit the legal profession and now works in a car wash (after bragging about certain victory);
  • filed an eighth lawsuit that will also be dismissed because I STILL don’t understand personal jurisdiction (even as I continue bragging about certain victory)…

…and if I were also a sycophant and ass-licking nut sniffer of a convicted bomber, drug dealer and forger who also happens to be an adjudicated pedophile…
…and if I were also a retired GS-13 writer editor who can neither write nor edit as well as the average 13 year old boy who has never seen a pencil…
…and if I were also a self-styled “investigative journalist of over thirty years experience” only if being a truck driver and a podunk deejay for 18 months in a market count as investigative journalism…
…and if I were also a multimedia moron who can’t seem to keep a single blog or Twitter name for more than forty days before saying something so dumb and self-incriminating it makes more sense to blow it all up and start over than to explain my idiocy…
…and if I were also a self-styled sufferer of “Parkinson’s disease” merely because I was once in the control group of a clinical study that I got kicked out of and I’ve been trying to parlay a fake disability into Progressive political street cred even though I never seems to actually get any worse…
…and if I were also a serial liar who had been caught out not dozens but HUNDREDS of times in my lies…
…and if I were also an adjudicated cyberharasser and cyberstalker with over a dozen orders of restraint to my name in half a dozen states, even though in each and every single case I BRAGGED OF CERTAIN VICTORY…
…and if I were also a man who produces, performs, broadcasts and sells audio skits depicting minors in sexual activities with adults in pornographic detail…
…and if I were also a man who produces, performs, broadcasts and sells audio skits that are purely racist in nature…
…and if I were also a man who refers to African Americans as “boy” in my podcasts…
…and if I were also a man who refers to Asian woman as mail order brides…
…and if I were also a twice-cuckolded useless excuse for a husband whose children – some of whom are even the fruit of my loins, though I’m not sure which ones – want nothing to do with me…
…and if I were also a man who sets up online dating profiles in which I lie about the fact that I have children and that I smoke like a fucking chimney, even though it’s bad for my fake Parkinson’s disease…
…and if I were also a man who enjoys an occasional top-shelf bourbon because I’m truly desperate enough to pay for it after wiping out the entire stock of the generic label at the Piggly Wiggly, even though it’s bad for my fake Parkinson’s…
…and if I were also a man so desperate to set up my enemies that I would curb rub my tires until they blow just so I could file a police report accusing a man of slashing them…
…and if I were also a man who sets up a GoFundMe to finance a 14,000 mile road trip two months before declaring myself so disabled by fake Parkinson’s that I cannot drive…
…and if I were also a man who drove 3000 miles from Iowa to South Carolina to Iowa to South Carolina just to chase the withered **** of the ugliest inflat-a-skank on the eastern seaboard two months before declaring myself so disabled by fake Parkinson’s that I cannot drive…

…common sense would dictate that I have no leg to stand on if I want to argue that anyone else is responsible for destroying my “sterling reputation” other than myself.

Boy! Thank God I’m none of those things…just the accruate reflection of someone who is ALL THOSE THINGS!


Take the balloon animal’s advice, DUMBFUCK:

Everything will proceed as I have foreseen:

Dismissal for all defendants – lack of jurisdiction.

Like(11)Dislike(0)

You Want To Talk Scoreboard? Okay, Let’s Talk Scoreboard

And remember, this is an accounting which is VERY GENEROUS to the gelatinous vermin Bill Schmalfeldt.  It does not account for individual counts filed against individual defendants in his LOLSUITS.  If it did, his humiliation would be even greater.


LOLSUIT I:

Schmalfeldt filed 4 counts against 10 defendants (including yours truly).

Scoreboard says:

SCHMALFELDT – 0, Defendants – 4


LOLSUIT II

Schmalfeldt filed 8 counts against 3 defendants (including yours truly).

Scoreboard says:

SCHMALFELDT – 0, Defendants – 8


LOLSUIT III

Schmalfeldt filed 4 counts against 4 defendants (including yours truly).

Scoreboard says:

SCHMALFELDT – 0, Defendants – 4


Let’s take a break and check the running total:

SCHMALFELDT, BIG FAT ZERO (in life as well as on the scoreboard) – 0

All Civil Defendants – 16

Back to the breakdown…


LOLSUIT IV

Schmalfeldt filed 3 counts against 4 defendants (including yours truly).

Scoreboard says:

SCHMALFELDT – 0, Defendants – 3


LOLSUIT V

Schmalfeldt filed 4 counts against 7 defendants (leaving out yours truly).

Scoreboard says:

SCHMALFELDT – 0, Defendants – 4


The running total:

SCHMALFELDT, STILL A BIG FAT ZERO (in life as well as on the scoreboard) – 0

All Civil Defendants – 23

This concludes the Maryland portion of our show, as DUMBFUCK fled to Wisconsin to escape the consequences of his perjured IFP application and the legal wizardry of David Edgren (hope the bike ride is going well, David!).

Back to the breakdown…


LOLSUIT VI

Schmalfeldt filed 4 counts against 6 defendants (leaving out yours truly).

Scoreboard says:

SCHMALFELDT – 0, Defendants – 4


LOLSUIT VII

Schmalfeldt filed 6 counts against 2 defendants (leaving out yours truly).

Scoreboard says:

SCHMALFELDT – 0, Defendants – 4


LOLSUIT VIII

Schmalfeldt filed 4 counts against 4 defendants (leaving out yours truly).

Scoreboard says:

RESULT PENDING BUT VIRTUALLY CERTAIN


Current running total:

BIG FAT LOSER BILL SCHMALFELDT – 0

Everyone he’s ever tried to sue – 33 (with 4 counts pending)


It’s hardly a surprise that he never wants to talk about THAT scoreboard, unless it’s to whine like a pussy about never having reached a point where his bullshit claims could be judged on lost on the merits.

To ask why is to answer the question, though.

Here’s an exit question: does government health insurance cover injuries sustained from sticking one’s tiny little penis into a wood chipper or the human equivalent? Asking for a friend…

Like(7)Dislike(0)

A Better Get-Rich-Quick Scheme Than Suing for Defamation All Over America

1. Move to North Carolina;

2. Let your soulmate (or inflat-a-skank, as the case may be) get a job;

3. Sue truck drivers for alienation of affection (hell, you might even find a lawyer to TAKE that case!);

4. PROFIT!

Like(7)Dislike(0)

Juxtaposition

In the field of Project Management, there is always a risk of miscommunication between the consumers of a product and the developers of the product.  This is often summarized with a common user complaint after the product arrives: “It’s exactly what I asked for, but it’s not what I wanted!”

On a tangential but almost related note, 20th Century satirist and social critic H.L. Mencken once remarked that “Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.”

I think if one places these sentiments in proximity, one can better understand the “solidarity pledge” published on Monday by the The Daily Princetonian, particularly this gem:

Perpetuation of double standards regarding the establishment of affinity living spaces. While the University allows for students to live together based on shared artistic (e.g. Edwards Collective ) or sustainability (e.g. Pink House) interests, it has declined to allow living spaces based on shared race or ethnicity.

You know, I’m pretty certain that there was a really big fight over this, primarily in the Democratic South, from the 1950s through the 1970s.  A lot of people, black and white, came together and fought to END the “separate but equal” policies that were so prevalent. And now, hordes of melty little historically illiterate snowflakes would rather hide than fight to hold on to the social gains their parents and grandparents suffered to achieve.

Freedom costs, and it is worth fighting for.  Sadly, freedom also encompasses the right to choose to hide from the scary voices that one is historically and intellectually unequipped to reasonably combat.

In the vernacular, it all comes back to properly defining the product you want delivered. In other words…

Be careful what you wish for, because you just might get it, good and hard. 

Like(11)Dislike(0)

Question of the Day

How large is the intersection of these two sets of people:

A: People who are praising actor  Ed Skrein for withdrawing from the Hellboy reboot because he is not of the same ethnic background (Asian-American) as the original character in the source material;

AND

B: People who want Idris Elba cast as the next James Bond.

I think Idris Elba is a fantastic actor.  I love his work, especially in the BBC series Luther.  I think he could also be a tremendous James Bond. But the fact remains that he is not of the same ethnic background as the original character in the source material.

You can’t have it both ways.

And another thing: it is my opinion that the Doctor is and always has been a unique character in the science fiction universe. For fifty-five years the Doctor has been an ever-changing male character, but coming soon, she will be female.  One of the wonderful things about sci-fi is the number of possibilities and choices that are available to the writers and showrunners. The freedom to take risks like this (and it is a risk to offer such a change to an audience overwhelmingly familiar with a male Doctor) is what creating art is all about.

I like Jodie Whitaker too.  I think she could be a fantastic Doctor.  Much will depend on the strength of the stories she is given and of the supporting cast.  A new showrunner with
new ideas setting new expectations makes this the perfect time to make this change.  I hope it brings a new demographic to the show, and I hope she succeeds in the role. But I’m not so foolish to think that if the ratings suffer, she won’t be replaced. Doctor Who is not ars gratia artis, it’s art for profit, and the goals are different.

But nothing ever remains static in television or movies.  Change happens all the time, whether we like it or not. Game of Thrones and The Walking Dead have made a separate art form within an art form of shocking their audiences with the unexpected deaths of major characters.

In the long run, I think it is simply foolish for those people who believe casting choices should conform to some arbitrary and capricious social justice agenda.  That cheapens the art. Let the artist have the vision and bring it forth as he or she desires.

If you don’t like it, don’t buy it.

Look for yourself and see what Marvel Comics has learned in the last three or four years about this.

Like(6)Dislike(0)

G.R.O.U.C.H. Or R.E.A.S.O.N.

ALL EDITORIALS ARE THE PERSONAL OPINION OF THE THINKING MAN’S ZOMBIE. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR OPPOSING VIEWPOINTS WILL BE PROVIDED FREE OF CHARGE. GROUND RULES (AND GENERALLY GOOD ADVICE FOR ANY PART OF YOUR LIFE, REALLY:

DON’T BE A DUMBFUCK.

It seems as if every town has an organization that, for our purposes, we shall refer to as the Group of Residents Outraged and United in Common Hostility. It doesn’t matter where you are. They all have an active chapter of the G.R.O.U.C.H. that wants all services delivered to their front door, and the tax bill that comes with it forwarded to the rich folks on the other side of town.

How can you tell if you are dealing with a chapter of G.R.O.U.C.H., and not a branch of the Responsible, Ethical Association of Sensible Outcomes Negotiated?

When a R.E.A.S.O.N. chapter approaches city government with a list of grievances, they will generally provide a road map for a direction they would like the city to take regarding the issues that they are concerned about.

G.R.O.U.C.H. makes baseless allegations without providing a shred of evidence. For instance, here’s a Black Lives Matter Organizer demanding that white people simply sign over their property to poor people:

<iframe width=”560″ height=”315″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/c6GB_b_ICc0″ frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen></iframe>

As a citizen interested in community involvement, we find ourselves drawn to R.E.A.S.O.N.

R.E.A.S.O.N. tells us that a citizen’s property is the fruit of his labor, and belongs to him.  Only a G.R.O.U.C.H. would suggest that someone else has a right to his property for their own use.

Consider this paragraph lifted from a Myrtle Beach G.R.O.U.C.H. chapter’s Facebook page:

Now it is all about gouging everyone for money, rudeness, and lining their own pockets and if they get in trouble, bribing their way out with cash. Now they are dealing w/ a windfall of cash from the TDF which is the penny sales tax only due in MB city limits, and they know they can personally use the money, pay off people to shut up w/ the money, and when a local person or business has a reasonable problem, they are abused, harassed, and their businesses are targeted for closure.

Let us dissect this single paragraph to see why this group qualifies as a G.R.O.U.C.H. affiliate.

“It’s all about gouging everyone for money…”

Examples? Do you know of anyone who has been gouged? How do you define “gouging?” Maybe what may seem like “gouging” to a G.R.O.U.C.H. may look more like a reasonable price adjustment if one takes the time and effort to discern the facts. A more recognizable example of “gouging” would be when a hard-traveling vexatious litigant files multiple Federal lawsuits, all seeking tens, sometimes hundreds of thousands of dollars in nonexistent damages for butthurt suffered at his own hands, in far-flung places like Maryland, Wisconsin, and Illinois before finally settling in South Carolina and filing another one after just three or four weeks of residency, before he has even secured better than transient lodgings.

THAT’S “gouging.”

Why would someone do that??

“…lining their own pockets…”

Oh.  Of course. If your only source of income is a pittance from the government earned from the sweat of 30-40 posts a day on political websites for eleven years on the taxpayer dime, and your inflat-a-skank gamer girlfriend blows it all on gaming account subscriptions and incestuous gay pornography, you’re going to need to seek extra income.  Especially when WalMart won’t hire you, even as a greeter on the overnight shift when the store is closed.

“…and if they get in trouble, bribing their way out with cash.”

The Federal Jails are FILLED with corrupt public officials who thought they could get away with taking bribes as enticement to exert influence. Four words. Democrat William J. Jefferson. Where is your proof of this gross misuse of the taxpayer dollar?

The writer goes on to rail against the crooks who would use their positions of trust – say, at the NIH – to suck up tax money as salary while spending all day on the Internet posting their uninformed political opinions and claiming to be unable to walk.

A little proof would go a long way to make this person sound more like a concerned citizen and less like an ignorant DUMBFUCK narcissist with Dunning-Kruger expertise in every subject and skill he’s ever read about.

To be affiliated with R.E.A.S.O.N. means to approach real problems with real solutions.

We all want the street lights on at night, the streets paved and repaired, the water to be clean, the police to be well-paid and respected, the criminals to look elsewhere for victims. If you approach the issues with R.E.A.S.O.N., you know the money to pay for all that has to come from somewhere.

R.E.A.S.O.N. also tells you that people who live their lives on the government tit, claiming poverty, disability and screaming “FEED ME AND MY SIXTEEN FATHERLESS CHILDREN” are the true drag on the taxpayer.

If you are a G.R.O.U.C.H., then you believe the fact that you level unproven accusations such as defamation, libel, intentional infliction of emotion distress, abuse of process and “saying mean things about me to ALL THE LANDLORDS!!!” means they are true, so tell your lawyer to settle already so I can own your houses and cars, but not your wives, kids or pets, because I’ll just abandon them on the side of the road or toss them in a river or something.

Like any city during these turbulent times, Myrtle Beach has issues that need to be faced. Who do we want facing them?

Well, if you come from a place of R.E.A.S.O.N. you don’t approacch problems and toss the ultimate question off without suggesting a solution.

Ask yourself, “WHAT WOULD A DUMBFUCK DO?” and then find someone who wants to do the exact opposite.  You’ll be glad you did.

Like(9)Dislike(0)

I’M A PRIVATE CITIZEN!

AND I JUST WANT TO BE LEFT ALONE.

Like(5)Dislike(0)

Why Steal Tweets? Why Not?

Sometimes, with some people…extra precautions are necessary when documenting very dangerous levels of stupidity.

And by dangerous I mean “handling nitroglycerin” dangerous.  The kind of dangerous that fear pee-soaked, sandy vagina, nutshuffling penises will delete without warning in a sudden explosion of rank cowardice.

Take this guy, for instance: he might be a world record holder in Twitter cowardice, with the most lost, abandoned or suspended Twitter handles in history. But since he’s a SJW-pussy, Twitter just lets him keep on keepin’ on, as long as his impotent attacks are directed at acceptable targets, even if they are so far out of his intellectual class they might as well be orbiting a different star (and I think that’s everybody who isn’t made of latex and living in a hotel).

This particular DUMBFUCK recently peed himself in an effort to show how the lawsuit in which he is currently sinking fast as a defendant will hinge on HOW TWITTER WORKS rather than on HOW A CONTRACT WORKS.

The reason he wants to argue about Twitter and not about contracts is painfully obvious to anyone with a double digit IQ.

But that’s not the purpose of this post.

The purpose of this post is to explore the reasons why Zombies like myself take screen caps of people’s tweets.

In three simple words: “Because they’re cowards.”

The image you see above is a screencap of a tweet. It’s STOLEN.  (shhh! our little secret…)

I made an image file of it, and uploaded it to an image hosting site.

Why would I do that?

So I could EMBED the URL of the tweet underneath it when I included the image in this post.  You’ll notice that the cursor changes because the image is a link.  Click it, if you want to go to a DUMFUCK Twitter account.

So there must be some advantage to doing this, right?

Indeed there is!

If you were an enterprising zombie, and you chose to delve into the archives on this site, you would find no small number of posts that make somewhat less sense now than they did when they were first published. The reason for this is that I followed the Twitter terms of service and embedded a tweet in the post.

And then the owner of the tweet (GUESS WHO?!?) deleted the tweet, and often the entire account, because he figured out that he might get in trouble for it, and that if he deleted the whole thing the trouble would vanish. Kind of like the old “Family Circus” cartoons:

Y’all remember the name of the oldest kid, don’tcha? Of course you do!

What I have done – what is necessary to do with someone who refuses to produce documents in discovery – is retain an image of the original tweet, so that certain nutshuffling footlong lovers who enjoy watching men fellate other men

It’s true!

can’t delete the evidence of their perfidy and later deny it ever happened.

So you can call it theft if you like, but wouldn’t it just be easier to use the term that a certain DUMBFUCK himself favors:

EVIDENCE GATHERING.

Like(7)Dislike(0)