What just happened?


Scawwy. I so scawwed.

I will blog what I want to blog.

I will tweet what I want to tweet.

And I know that Buzz Punko-Makes-Ladies-Blow-Chunko will see it all. Because he’s certainly not looking for me.

Hey! Quit bothering me in there!  I see you not leaving me alone!
Hey! Quit bothering me in there! I see you not leaving me alone!

Oh, wait – I have a new follower on Twitter!

Even a ridiculous, sand-pantied, skirt-hiking runaway pussy DUMBFUCK knows that RIDICULE IS NOT A FUCKING TORT, any more than BUTTHURT is.  And automated emails from third parties (like WordPress pingbacks or Twitter notifications) are NOT contact, whether a weeping, sand-filled, nutshuffling cockfaced pussy comes looking for it or not.

So, Zombies, always remember – you come looking?  You get what you get.

What the hell is he gonna do? File a RICO lawsuit or something?

I’d like to see it.


Author: Paul Krendler

The Thinking Man's Zombie

12 thoughts on “Wait…What?”

  1. A RICO suit would be just the cherry on the sundae of his FAILsuits. Oh so precious.

    1. He's almost certainly going to lose his motion for lulzsuit welfare soon, which precludes Lolcow Billy filing another one because he pissed away his blood money on nonsense and booze. Just as everyone knew that he would.

      At some point, his doing the same thing over and over again will stop being so hilarious. I'll be sure to let everyone know when that happens.

      1. Oh Dear Lord. Does he really mean it this time? I mean have we reached the 100th time that he's now serious?

        Someone help me out.

        Should i be afraid of the mayo eating slob of Room 108?

        1. "You asked me once, what was in Room 108. I told you that you knew the answer already. Everyone knows it. The thing that is in Room 108 is the worst thing in the world."

  2. In the lexicon of Witless Willie, what "private information" SEEMS to include is anything that he has already made public. People have said about him things (i) that he has NOT, to my personal knowledge, admitted himself, and (ii) that I for one have always believed to be OBVIOUSLY hyperbolic ridicule rather than fact. Is Witless saying that one or more of these things are actual fact not previously disclosed by him and thus are an invasion of his privacy? Please, please tell me that none of these things that I have assumed were hyperbole were factual (of course the only one who could say with absolute knowledge is Willie himself).

      1. The answer to that is pretty obvious: Bill Schmalfeldt would be seeking out NEW victims to threaten, stalk, and harass. Which means that when we keep that MUNKO Bill Schmalfeldt in a tizzy, we're actually doing the innocent public a service, by distracting the DUMBF5CK from would-be innocent victims of Schmalfeldt's psychotic behavior. This means YOU, Cindy!


Comments are closed.