Only a DUMBFUCK Could Miss the Point of This Post

Let us consider the curious case of Bill Munko, also known as Bill Schmalfeldt.

Bill Schmalfeldt is known to be an adjudicated cyberstalker and cyberharasser.  He has over the last several years, been served with NINE restraining orders from FIVE different states.  He is currently under court orders to avoid contact with persons in Arizona, Illinois, Massachusetts and North Carolina.

He claims that he has recently reported one of these persons to law enforcement for writing a letter that he has forgotten sending, likely due to Parkinson’s Dementia, a condition he has publicly admitted to having more than once, including in a letter to a federal judge presiding over a lawsuit which was none of his fucking business but he still stuck his shitcaked nose into because reasons.

He has made clear, several times and in no uncertain terms, that he believes I am that person, most recently yesterday.

View post on imgur.com

View post on imgur.com

View post on imgur.com

View post on imgur.com

Now, if any of you voracious Zombies had been ordered by a court in Illinois to avoid contact with a person, would you not avoid contact with that person?  Would you not follow the text of the order, to wit:

The Respondent is prohibited from threatening to commit staking or committing stalking.  “Stalking” means engaging in a “course of conduct” directed at a specific person, when you know or should know that this course of conduct would cause a reasonable person to fear for his or her safety or the safety of a third person or suffer emotional distress.  A stalking “course of conduct” includes acts in which you directly, indirectly or through third parties, by any action, method, device, or means follow monitor, observe, surveil, threaten or communicate to or about, a person; or engage in other contact; or interfere with or damage a person’s property or pet. Stalking can include contact via electronic communications.  See 740 ILCS 21/10 for additional definitions.

Consider a few of the specific terms above.

Prohibited from…committing stalking.  This seems pretty clear

Stalking means engaging in a “course of conduct” directed at a specific person when you know…that this course of conduct would cause a reasonable person to fear for his safety…or suffer emotional distress. 

Do you think being repeatedly and unsuccessfully sued for butthurt (which still is not a tort) would cause a reasonable person to suffer emotional distress?  Might it even cause a person to have years – YEARS!! – shaved off his lifespan as a result?  That certainly seems like it would be emotionally distressing.  It also seems like something Bill Schmalfeldt would or should know about, because he has used those EXACT words to describe the emotional distress he claims to have been caused by others in the past. (Just because he forgets a lot of the shit he says, doesn’t mean the rest of us do.)

A stalking “course of conduct” includes acts in which you DIRECTLY…by any ACTION, METHOD, DEVICE or MEANS, follow, MONITOR, OBSERVE, surveil, THREATEN or COMMUNICATE to or ABOUT A PERSON; or engage in OTHER CONTACT…Stalking can include CONTACT VIA ELECTRONIC MEANS. (caps are mine)

So if the respondent – Bill Schmalfeldt – DIRECTLY by any ACTION, METHOD, DEVICE or MEANS (such as a VPN like CyberGhost Premium),

View post on imgur.com

View post on imgur.com

MONITORS or OBSERVES a PERSON, COMMUNICATES to or ABOUT A PERSON, or engages in other CONTACT (such as attempting to leave comments – ONE HUNDRED THIRTEEN OF THEM AT LAST COUNT – on a website he believes with 100% certainty belongs to that person)

…VIA ELECTRONIC MEANS, isn’t that Respondent – Bill Schmalfeldt – guilty of violating that Stalking No Contact Order?

And even more, after having been so blocked by me, if Bill Schmalfeldt PROACTIVELY AND WITHOUT PROVOCATION purchases a subscription service solely to overcome that block to view the website he believes with 100% certainty belongs to the person he is PROHIBITED FROM STALKING, isn’t adjudicated cyberstalker and cyberharasser Bill Schmalfeldt going to extreme (as well as extremely obvious) criminal lengths to violate that court order?

I wonder what a federal investigator would do with that information?

View post on imgur.com

 

Like(2)Dislike(0)

Author: Paul Krendler

The Thinking Man’s Zombie

23 thoughts on “Only a DUMBFUCK Could Miss the Point of This Post”

  1. If the depraved DUMBF5CK had a single brain cell not addled by dementia, that it hasn't been picked up for repeatedly violating that order would be all the evidence needed to convince the repulsive recreant that our beloved HZIC is not Grady.

    I wonder if Grady would be interested in buying a slightly used website? Or perhaps THE Prince of Parody (may DONATIONS and FUN be always upon him), should consider forwarding any comments addressed to Grady to the intended recipient? Asking for a horde... who'd like to see the loathsome loser locked up.

    Like(2)Dislike(0)
  2. It's called a Catch 51.15, which was the first draft of Catch-22. If Grady is Krendler, then Bill has been stalking Grady, which is against the Peace Order. If Krendler isn't Grady, then all the harassing has been useless since Bill is just laying out how wrong he is about Krendler and Grady. If he's sane, then he pays a price, but if he's insane, then he's not guilty and might be locked up. [Now, reread it like Vizzini from Princess Bride.]

    It's called a Catch 51.15, in honor of the Wisconsin Mental Health Act. 51.15 starts on the bottom of page 11:

    http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/51.pdf

    Like(3)Dislike(0)
  3. According to Munko - ( http://archive.is/zwFre )

    "If the author of the Thinking Man’s Zombie blog admits, in a notarized affidavit, that he is Patrick Grady of Palatine, IL, then I will have lost my legal ability to contact said author. As long as he hides behind a pseudonym, he has no legal grounds to charge me with violating ANYTHING. However, the investigation into Patrick Grady’s conspiracy — with George Meredith Howell of Germantown, Maryland and WJJ Hoge III of Westminster, Maryland to concoct phony evidence against me continues… out of my hands… in the capable hands of federal and state authorities.
    Nice corner there, “Krendler.”"

    Paul Krendler has never admitted to being Patrick Grady, you idiot. Munko filed yet another lawsuit claiming that Krendler is Grady. This means YOU are declaring that Grady is Krendler, and by your own logic, admitting that you are in contempt of a peace order.

    Why are you having so much trouble figuring that out, fuckface?

    Like(6)Dislike(0)
    1. "If the author of the Thinking Man’s Zombie blog admits, in a notarized affidavit, that he is Patrick Grady of Palatine, IL, then I will have lost my legal ability to contact said author."

      "Paul Krendler has never admitted to being Patrick Grady, you idiot. Munko filed yet another lawsuit claiming that Krendler is Grady. This means YOU are declaring that Grady is Krendler, and by your own logic, admitting that you are in contempt of a peace order."

      The stupid... it buuuuurns.

      Like(2)Dislike(0)
  4. I love how Sir Neck-Less Fucknugget keeps humping that deflated football about TMZs "diminished readership."

    How many posts you got on your various blogs/twitter, Fatass? Go ahead and count the sockpuppets.... your "readership" still falls in the single didgits, twatwaffle. So if your measuring your manhood by your blog/Twitter traffic, like everything else in your sorry ass existence, you come up woefully short.

    FOADIAF

    Like(6)Dislike(0)
    1. The Deranged Cyberstalker Bill Schmalfeldt's "excellent friends" don't even bother to comment on his blogs nor do they respond much, if at all, to his Twitter account du jour.

      Just like an ignored, rabid, mangy, runt pup in the welping box... whining... "Pay attention to meeeee!"

      Bill Schmalfeldt is toxic. And, jealous, jealous, jealous. #Loser

      Like(5)Dislike(0)
        1. Thank you, Jane! But I rarely have anything to say that hasn't already been said better by you or one of the other regulars. That's one of the reasons I so enjoy coming here and to the affiliated blogs - great, smart, funny stuff!

          I do and will continue to chime in every now and then though, if only to remind our adversaries that the horde contains many, many fans who mostly lurk.

          Like(2)Dislike(0)
        2. Well, for God's sake, LURK MORE! AND TELL YOUR FRIENDS TO DO THE SAME!!

          Don't you know my readership is flagging and my ego needs bolstering?

          FFS.

          Like(2)Dislike(0)
  5. https://twitter.com/MunkoTales/status/760593532990160896

    Hey, look! Someone's drunk. Again.

    Like(5)Dislike(0)
    1. She was only ever holding him back from fully embracing his inner sphincter sucking Munko dancing whale blubber flapping psychostalker.

      Now he can really let his freak flag fly.

      Off the back of the Scootypuff. (It's red. Vroom, VROOOOM!!)

      Like(4)Dislike(0)
  6. I never got into calling Bill Schmalfeldt a pedophile. Even losing his email account could've been for another reason like malware instead of being for child pornography. But today after reading his blog post, "Seems Like The Zombie Is No Longer Thinking Clearly," I do suspect Bill Schmalfeldt is likely a pedophile and has a sexual attraction to children because he wrote about owning a child's ass. Who writes about owning a child's ass unless they're attracted to children? You're disgusting, Bill, and pathetic. You should write an apology blog post for mentioning a child's ass in that way.

    Like(5)Dislike(0)
    1. Exactly. Bill writes disgusting crap like that and then wonders why normal, sane people get the impression that his attraction to children is, shall we say, not healthy.

      That is, normal, sane people who haven't already run into his "satire" involving prepubescent boys being raped by other prepubescent boys while the adult in charge takes pictures. Normal, sane people who are already aware of this "satire" already know that Bill's proclivities aren't healthy or socially acceptable.

      Like(1)Dislike(0)
  7. Holy Shit PK--------You've done it AGAIN!!!!! You have caused this idiotic circus monkey to dance, dance, dance for another day. ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha He is the easiest manipulated cyberstalker online today. Congrats on winning the internet for a second day.

    Like(3)Dislike(0)

Comments are closed.