38 thoughts on “OHNOES! KNOT AGAIN, AGAIN, AGAIN!!!”

    1. Bill is successful at one thing in life apparently: getting repeatedly and reliably kicked off Twitter.

      Bravo!

      ;D

      Like(0)Dislike(0)
  1. Stalking? Threats? Or did they connect him to one of his hundred-odd previous accounts?

    Like(0)Dislike(0)
  2. Wow! Do you think Twitter has finally figured out that Bill Schmalfeldt of St. Francis, WI, formerly of Elkridge, MD, admittedly dementia addled, self-proclaimed demented cyberstalker, slapped with multiple restraining orders in multiple states - maybe double digits by now - and thereby adjudicated by multiple judges as a stalking harasser (or is it harassing stalker?), repeatedly cuckolded, whose own children want nothing to do with the malignant monster, given a sort of cease and desist from a national Parkinson's charity who demanded Bill Schmalfeldt disassociate from them, photographed wearing medals not included on Bill Schmalfeldt's DD-214 which is what is known as STOLEN VALOR, is not using their service as they require?

    Like(0)Dislike(0)
  3. http://i.imgur.com/kVLDCYx.png

    lulz..

    It's silent in the Schmalfeldt apartment. Well, except for Gail's constant tick-tocking..

    Like(0)Dislike(0)
  4. Why is he posting pictures of that young girl? That's pretty pervy. I mean, why is he after her daughter like that? That's just so...creepy. Maybe Ash should let the local police know about his unnatural interest in her child. I'm also guessing her husband will be pretty upset about that stalker photo montage of his daughter.

    Like(0)Dislike(0)
    1. Well good old Bill likes to apparently go after woman that can't fight back. Very telling. I think Roy knows something about Bill and woman that can't fight back. You'd have to ask him though.

      Like(0)Dislike(0)
  5. Bill is slipping into absolute madness. He is threatening and extorting a woman, on his blog, just days before a restraining order hearing against him from another woman. He is getting twitter accounts suspended at a rate most of us change our socks. His legal filings are getting increasingly incoherent - he is listing "Defendants" in the body of the complaint that he doesn't even name in the header. And the worse thing - at least as far as his "friends" are concerned - is that he is opening them up to inclusion in the blowback.

    Like(0)Dislike(0)
    1. Equally telling is that his "friends" have ceased responding to him on Twitter. When you alienate that group of scum you have really hit a new low.

      Like(0)Dislike(0)
      1. Well, that, and the fact that he has to create new twitter handles daily, which means they don't know what name it is currently using.

        Like(0)Dislike(0)
    1. He really refuses to believe that he could possibly have violated the Twitter TOS. I guess they have now joined the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy along with Microsoft.

      Like(0)Dislike(0)
  6. Bill is telling another lie on his website.

    He says he can do without twitter for the duration of the lawsuit.

    What's the over under on this? Since he is pretty much limited to his own blog and the Pedo Bunny Boy Unread abomination, I am sure he'll be back on because Team Kimbergarten need their Ombudsman in the social media fray.

    Like(0)Dislike(0)
  7. Does anyone think that Twitter is getting extortionate email and threats to be added to a failsuit if they don't accede to certain drunken demands? hahahaha

    Like(0)Dislike(0)
    1. The best part of this is the context. Twitter's enforcement of its TOS has been notoriously flexible, especially in regards to 'politically incorrect' speech. They're very heavily tilted towards progressive mentality.

      Which means that Bill's antics have to be so bad that they would rather jettison him, much as DailyKOS did, rather than deal with the fallout.

      Like(0)Dislike(0)
  8. ICYMI: Great new heading at TDPZ's place!

    “Billy Sez – The Fevered Ravings of an Adjudicated Stalker Who is Trying to Frighten Me into Silence ”

    I’m glad she’s refusing to be bullied but expected nothing else.

    Like(0)Dislike(0)
  9. I see the deranged idiot William Schmalfeldt is talking about libel and defamation again. He should remember that he has publicly, in writing, stated as fact that I have committed two crimes. He wrote to a public official that I committed criminal stalking (which requires a physical presence, and I have never been anywhere near him) and he said that I fabricated evidence I submitted to a court (when all I had to do was give them copies of his threatening emails). THAT is defamation - stating as a a fact that someone has committed a crime when you know they haven't.

    Like(0)Dislike(0)
    1. It's business as usual for him; he has never, ever said anything wrong, and anyone else saying something he doesn't like is committing the worst crimes ever!

      He really, really, just needs to give his computer away and try to develop some IRL activities. Sadly for him he won't, since that presumably wouldn't allow him to indulge his misogynistic impulses without facing immediate real world consequences. I doubt his neighbors would enjoy hearing him call women c**ts, t**ts, s**ts, b***hs, and any of his other "terms of endearment".

      Like(0)Dislike(0)
    2. If Stalin were still alive (one can't defame the dead) and someone referred to him as a murderer, under Schmalfeldt's theory that would be defamation because Stalin was never convicted of the crime of murder.

      Like(0)Dislike(0)
      1. Am I just dreaming this, or didn't William make a number of conclusory legal remarks about Mary;and's Grace's Law in regards to two unnamed gentlemen who were, in fact, never charged?

        It sure seems to me that he made remarks very similar to what he's suing over now.

        And. if I'm not mistaken, the statue of limitations has another two months to run ....

        Like(0)Dislike(0)

Comments are closed.