Guess the Lies

Let’s play a game!

Tomorrow is the hearing in Kane County IL to determine if the temporary no contact order Lynn Thomas has against Bill Schmalfeldt will be made permanent.  

When the hearing is done, and Nill Schmalfeldt hasn’t shown up, and Lynn Thomas has her permanent order, he will open a new Twitter account, retreat to his readerless blog (or both) and catalog all the LIES THAT LYNN THE LYING LIAR LAID OUT.

So let’s get out front, and figure out what lies Schmalfeldt will come up with before he does.

Like(0)Dislike(0)

Author: Paul Krendler

The Thinking Man's Zombie

46 thoughts on “Guess the Lies”

  1. Those phone calls - out of the blue, accusing the victim of wrongs, on the machine of elderly parents - weren't harassing! Oh, no, certainly not!

    Like(0)Dislike(0)
  2. My most excellent pals didn't pay me a cent to do this! ( it was a few hundred more, but not a cent.) @BunnyBoyUnread @zero @cuckoldedmusician

    Like(0)Dislike(0)
  3. The judge did not understand Cassidy and so wrongfully excluded the proof that LT is Grady in drag and so really is Krendler.

    Like(0)Dislike(0)
  4. LETTER!!! TURDSRFOOD!!! PHOTO!!!

    HOOOOOOOGGGGEEEE!!!!

    (OK, not lies. Just predicting what he'll say was ignored.)

    Like(0)Dislike(0)
  5. I think the bigger challenge is, "When isn't he going to lie?"

    He wouldn't know the truth if it him. Compulsive liars like him can never utter any truth.

    Like(0)Dislike(0)
  6. Point of order, HZIC:

    Tomorrow is the hearing in Kane County IL to determine if the temporary no contact order Lynn Thomas has against Bill Schmalfeldt will be made permanent.

    That's a stalking no contact order.

    You know, the kind where a court makes a finding of fact that the respondent has engaged in a stalking course of conduct as the prerequisite for granting the order.

    The kind that a Cook County court has already granted against William M. "Bill" Schmalfeldt of St. Francis, Wi. (late of Elkridge, Md.)...

    ... meaning that court found that Schmalfeldt engaged in a stalking course of conduct...

    ... meaning that court adjudicated him a stalker.

    Like(0)Dislike(0)
    1. And given that his fat ass can't count a curb, that conduct was all online making him a cyberstalker. Q. E. Dumbfuck.

      Like(0)Dislike(0)
  7. "SHE DIDN'T CALL ME, EVER, MUCH LESS TO CONFIRM SHE WAS REALLY GOING TO COURT!!! I WENT TO SEE MY PROCTOLOGIST INSTEAD!!! I HAD TO ASSUME SHE WASN'T GOING BECAUSE REASONS!!"

    Like(0)Dislike(0)
    1. Yeah, about his dogs: if he thought he was ever going to get traction with the clients/customers of my wife's dog training business, he PROBABLY shouldn't have just abandoned his dogs when he moved, without so much as a second thought of them. The folks in our circle of friends/clients don't take kindly to people who mistreat or abandon their dogs.

      Like(0)Dislike(0)
      1. I don't disagree (the missus and I are large contributors to our local humane society, and to several rescues), but with the level of care he was going to provide, the dogs are probably better off without him.

        Like(0)Dislike(0)
  8. I'm not sure how all his emailed exhibits can be accepted since Lynn, her laywer if she has one, and for that matter the judge will be unable to question him about them.

    Like(0)Dislike(0)
    1. I presume that some of you know what really happened in Illinois today because you seem to be commenting on it. Please share.

      Assuming what is being said is not perfectly justifiable mockery in line with the initial focus of this thread, I am guessing that Willie did what he did against AD: failed to appear but sent a slew of exhibits.

      Like(0)Dislike(0)
      1. Never mind. Have now read the next post.

        I wonder how this record of restraining / peace orders is going to play into the objections to subpoenas?

        Like(0)Dislike(0)
  9. Hey, look!

    "Magnanimous Bill" makes his return:

    "If you’ve lawyered up, have your lawyer get in touch with me and I will be glad to discuss how we can make this whole thing go away for you. Well, for some of you."

    Yeah, no, thanks. My lawyers will show you how "anal rape" actually works, Cousin.

    Presuming, of course, you ever actually manage to serve me...

    Like(0)Dislike(0)
    1. Right now, I am thinking that for the New Year I shall file an objection to the request for subpoenas on the grounds that: (1) others whom Witless Willie has had disputes with have been SWATted; (2) Witless Willie is currently subject to, or within the last four years has been subject to, peace / restraining orders in multiple states, and (3) he is friends with a convicted serial bomber. I also remember him saying (but my memory may be faulty) that he had favors to call in from the Chicago mob.

      If I do, it will be my gift for the New Year to those who are being sued for exercising their constitutional rights.

      Like(0)Dislike(0)
      1. And remember, we're all "weasels" according to his latest blog title. If he wants to fight weasels, perhaps we should give him weasels. I'm not sure he realizes what weasels really are or how they fight.

        Like(0)Dislike(0)

Comments are closed.