20 thoughts on “Regarding That Letter”

  1. The demented freak desperately wants to believe he didn't write that letter, but on some level, he knows he did.

    Repeatedly adjudicated a harassing stalker, he'd give anything, including his caretaker, for just some tiny bit of vindictive damage to WJJH, whom the repugnant FAILURE blames for all that he's done to himself; probably even for being rejected in high school. Cos lying liars lie, especially to themselves.

    WJJH didn't "trick" him into acting like an obsessed stalker, determined to harass his only lord and master's targets until they stopped writing the truth about the puny pedo.

    WJJH didn't "trick" him into showing what an evil monster he truly is by attacking a family, including a grieving mom who'd never heard of him, demanding "answers" to offensive, vicious questions accusations, threats, and demands, nor did WJJH cause him to report this grieving family to protective services. If that agency had taken him seriously, the surviving children would have been at the very least scarred for life. Even though they didn't, that malicious report is part of that family's record forever, because they dared to not cower before evil.

    WJJH didn't "trick" him into harassing others, or making extortionate threats to a single mom, months before WJJH ever heard of him, iirc.

    WJJH didn't cause those extreme right wing tea party types at the Daily KOS to write this:

    ha. i tried to reason w/ him at one point. (7+ / 0-)

    i recall he wanted to do a story on a fellow kossack (something about exposing things at her place of work). he harassed and pressured her, and clearly ‘stalked’ her. demeaned her…because she wouldn’t give him the story that would likely elevate him to the levels of woodward/bernstein…or something.

    creepy.

    Creepy, indeed. And vile.

    Like(0)Dislike(0)
  2. I found another coercive email in my inbox, dated Wednesday, but I've been pretty busy and it got hidden in the spam.

    Apparently I'm trying to leave comments on his excresence of a blog. However, unlike him, I understand that if I tell someone that I want no direct contact, I don't contact him either (because it gives him an excuse). Also I don't think of myself as a fifi.

    And I can promise you that I have never, ever used a picture of his mother, no matter how doctored, as my avatar.

    And if he thinks otherwise, he better prove it. I've got better things to do than try to prove to some abusive, cyberstalking harasser that I didn't do something I didn't do.

    Like(0)Dislike(0)
    1. So, to spell it out clearly, since we all know that his reading comprehension isn't the best.

      DO NOT CONTACT ME. EVER. NOT BY MAIL. NOT BY E-MAIL. NOT BY PHONE. NOT BY TWITTER. NOT FROM ANY PRESENT, PAST, OR FUTURE ACCOUNT. NOT BY ANY CURRENTLY KNOWN OR UNKNOWN COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY.

      NO DIRECT CONTACT.

      You'd think he'd have figured it out, what with the April 16th court date, but I guess harassing creeps gotta creepily harass.

      Like(0)Dislike(0)
    1. Whether he's stupid enough to believe his own nonsense is beside the point -- Isn't the freak violating the restraining order issued in Illinois by writing about Mr. Grady?

      Like(0)Dislike(0)
      1. I would think so. And whether or not Patrick and Paul turn out to be one and the same, the fact that Bill has written on multiple occasions that he thinks they are should prove to a court that he is intentionally trying to violate the PO.

        I seem to recall some story, supposedly something that baby lawyers tended to have to discuss in law school, about how if someone threatens someone with an unloaded gun, knowing it is unloaded, even if they pull the trigger, they aren't guilty of attempted murder (a lot of other stuff, yes, attempted murder, no), and conversely, if someone fires an unloaded gun at another, thinking the gun is loaded, they are indeed guilty of attempted murder. Something about mens rea I think?

        I'm sure the legal types here can correct me if I'm wrong, but it would seem that whether or not PK = PG, Bill is guilty of breaking the PO, because he's gone after Paul, thinking he's Patrick.

        Like(0)Dislike(0)
      2. You just can't make this stuff up.

        BS knows he is not to contact nor write about PG. So, he exclaims all over the Internet that he believes PK is PG, and then goes about contacting him and writing about him. Unreal.

        This will most likely not end well for BS. Astounding behavior for someone facing a trial here soon for violating another order that he's under. This dummy must really, really like the idea of fines and/or jail time.

        Like(0)Dislike(0)
    2. Bill is making some major assumptions here. As usualy, they will probably come back to bite him in the ass.

      I'm looking forward to reading his next legal opus. I will have to make sure there is plenty of popcorn.

      Like(0)Dislike(0)
    3. The wheels, they keep on turning and turning and turning and turning up the same suppositions in Bill's head. Sigh. Whatta maroon!

      Like(0)Dislike(0)

Let the Horde Speak Out!