Featured

Bill Schmalfeldt Said:

In a comment at 22:29 EDT on July 2, 2016 at Billy Sez

If you ever had children, Jane, assuming you could find a man willing to touch you, I would be only too happy to urinate on them. With you as their mother, it would be the best thing to ever happen to them. At least the water would be warm.

Bill Schmalfedt will deny it until put under oath.  Because Bill Schmalfeldt is a shit-sniffing, turdrolling, toddlerstalking, liar, and I have 100% incontrovertible proof.

He can weep and beg and demand to see it like the sand-packed pussy he is.  Someone else may show him, because I’m not the only one with the proof. But I guarantee-damn-tee that I will release it at a moment of maximum personal advantage to me, and there is nothing anyone can do about it.

UPDATE:

http://images.wikia.com/victorious/images/f/fa/Bye_bye_bye.gif

Like(15)Dislike(0)

Fair Warning For All Democrats This Evening

When Donald Trump starts trolling you on Twitter during Shrillary Clinton’s spellcasting over the cauldron acceptance speech tonight (because he will)…

…try to remember that you’re being trolled.

If you go all Splodey McSplodeyface in response, he wins.

My money’s on Splodey McSplodeyface.  Because feeeeeeeeeeeeels.

Like(4)Dislike(0)

Credit Where Due

View post on imgur.com

On the rare occasions when DUMBFUCK is right, he deserves credit. No judge is going to force a disabled man to travel for a court hearing.

DUMBFUCK is absolutely correct.  And I said so at the time.

But I also said “no judge would rule in your favor should you fail to appear to defend yourself. Entirely your call.”

No one is forcing DUMBFUCK to travel.  The choice is his.

Whatever he chooses will lead to an action. Or a lack of action, as the case may be.

That action (or failure to act) will PROCEED to a clearly FORESEEABLE consequence.

And if when ALL PROCEEDS AS ANYONE COULD HAVE FORESEEN, who will bear the responsibility for the consequence?

The decision maker, who decides whether to act or not to act.

That is the question.

Like(9)Dislike(0)

Clarity in Language Is Essential

I saw the following on Facebook, and immediately understood the intent.

But it’s also very easy to see how a random DUMBFUCK could mentally emphasize the wrong word and go completely off the reservation.

(Was that RAAAAACIST?)

Is your emphasis on the second-to-last word, or on the last word?

It’s the difference between the lightning and the lightning bug, as Twain said.

Like(6)Dislike(0)

IOKIYAD

I have been noting with no small amount of wicked glee over the last two days the spin coming out of the Democratic National Convention in the wake of the #DNCLeak.

You know…Democrats be all like

“OMGWTFBBQ – First person ever to ask a foreign government to interfere in an election!  TREASON! TREASON!  RESIGN! RESIGN!”

Uh…nope.

I’m old enough to remember when this happened.

“On 9-10 May of this year,” the May 14 memorandum explained, “Sen. Edward Kennedy’s close friend and trusted confidant [John] Tunney was in Moscow.” (Tunney was Kennedy’s law school roommate and a former Democratic senator from California.) “The senator charged Tunney to convey the following message, through confidential contacts, to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Y. Andropov.”

Kennedy’s message was simple. He proposed an unabashed quid pro quo. Kennedy would lend Andropov a hand in dealing with President Reagan. In return, the Soviet leader would lend the Democratic Party a hand in challenging Reagan in the 1984 presidential election.

Foreign powers?  Messing about in American presidential elections?  At the behest of “The Liberal Lion?” The man our current President eulogized as ” the greatest legislator of our time?”

Kennedy made Andropov a couple of specific offers.

First he offered to visit Moscow. “The main purpose of the meeting, according to the senator, would be to arm Soviet officials with explanations regarding problems of nuclear disarmament so they may be better prepared and more convincing during appearances in the USA.” Kennedy would help the Soviets deal with Reagan by telling them how to brush up their propaganda.

Ted Kennedy, a Democrat, would tell the Soviet Union how to “brush up their propaganda?”

Kennedy would make certain the networks gave Andropov air time–and that they rigged the arrangement to look like honest journalism.

Well, isn’t it a good thing we don’t have that problem today?

/sarcasm

And why would Ted Kennedy, the Greatest Democrat of his Generation, who was entirely perfect and blameless of anything that ever happened in his life while not behind the wheel of an Oldsmobile, offer such aid and comfort to the Soviet Union during the Cold War?

Surely not something so trivial and callow as presidential politics?

“Tunney remarked that the senator wants to run for president in 1988,” the memorandum continued. “Kennedy does not discount that during the 1984 campaign, the Democratic Party may officially turn to him to lead the fight against the Republicans and elect their candidate president.”

Whoops.

Remember kids:

IT’S OKAY IF YOU’RE A DEMOCRAT.

BUT NOT IF YOU’RE A REPUBLICAN.

OR A DEMOCRAT RUNNING AS A REPUBLICAN.

Like(4)Dislike(0)

In Which A DUMBFUCK “Journalist” Forgets He Is A DUMBFUCK, Not A Journalist

View post on imgur.com

Exit question:  If Hillary Clinton wins the election, won’t that prove Trump’s point?

Like(4)Dislike(0)